WHO Scientific Advisory Group Bias?

The World Health Organisation has appointed a new scientific advisory group called SAGO dedicated to "developing a framework to define comprehensive studies on the origins [of] pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2." 

According to US Right to Know, SAGO is seriously compromised: "The first WHO-convened Global Study of Origins of SARS-CoV-2 failed for several reasons. It was tarnished by conflicts of interest. It failed to seriously investigate the possibility of a lab origin, while advancing the dubious cold chain, frozen food hypothesis. It seemed to act as a public relations instrument of the EcoHealth Alliance and the Chinese government. Participation in this botched WHO panel must be disqualifying for SAGO membership,"

To what extent do you Agree/Disagree with the statement that any member that participated in the first "botched WHO panel" should automatically be disqualified from SAGO membership?

--------------------------

Related Issue: World Health Organization Trust?

***

About PByT Surveys

The PByT surveys represent a rolling snapshot of global sentiment from real people whose identity has been verified. The results can be analyzed in a variety of ways to get a better understanding of key issues utilizing Bayesian statistics - a mathematical concept that updates beliefs in light of new data or evidence.

As a result, these surveys have the potential to be the most definitive resources on some of the most critically important issues of modern times.

Have your say and help shape the interconnected world of tomorrow based on trust.