WHO Scientific Advisory Group Bias?
The World Health Organization has appointed a Scientific Advisory Group to study the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO)
The World Health Organisation has appointed a new scientific advisory group called SAGO dedicated to "developing a framework to define comprehensive studies on the origins [of] pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2."
According to US Right to Know, SAGO is seriously compromised: "The first WHO-convened Global Study of Origins of SARS-CoV-2 failed for several reasons. It was tarnished by conflicts of interest. It failed to seriously investigate the possibility of a lab origin, while advancing the dubious cold chain, frozen food hypothesis. It seemed to act as a public relations instrument of the EcoHealth Alliance and the Chinese government. Participation in this botched WHO panel must be disqualifying for SAGO membership,"
To what extent do you Agree/Disagree with the statement that any member that participated in the first "botched WHO panel" should automatically be disqualified from SAGO membership?
--------------------------
Feedback ... (No Comments)
Please log in or join, in order to view or give feedback.