Australia's Energy Future: Time to stop going around in circles?
For too long, this debate has gone in circles. It’s time to agree on a direction, develop a long-term plan, and stick with it — beyond election cycles.
Labor and Coalition parties are offering differing visions for Australia’s energy future.
For too long, this debate has gone in circles. It’s time to agree on a direction, develop a long-term plan, and stick with it — beyond election cycles.
Frequent policy changes and uncertainty are among the reasons Australians are paying some of the highest energy prices in the developed world.
Which of these two approaches do you believe will more effectively bring down energy prices, secure Australia's energy future, and meet our global climate obligations?
🔹 Option 1 (Coalition): An energy mix that includes nuclear for baseload power, with gas and coal as interim sources while building a nuclear + renewables future.
🔹 Option 2 (Labor): Accelerate the transition to renewable energy to achieve a fully renewable-powered economy as quickly as possible.
***
About PByT Surveys & Open Democracy
The PByT surveys represent a rolling snapshot of global sentiment from real people whose identity has been verified. The results can be analyzed in a variety of ways to get a better understanding of key issues utilizing Bayesian statistics - a mathematical concept that updates beliefs in light of new data or evidence.
As a result, these surveys have the potential to be the most definitive resources on some of the most critically important issues of modern times and serve as the basis for the idea of "open democracy."
Have your say and help shape the interconnected world of tomorrow based on trust, mutual-aid and cooperation.
Click to give Feedback
Please log in to give feedback.
Connect