From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free?
Antisemitic slogan or genuine call for a peaceful resolution
<--The Australian Greens' Peace Plan for the Middle East
If there was ever a stumbling block to peace in the Middle East and an end to the suffering, it is clearly represented by Nasser Mashni's wink of hypocrisy.
Mashni's simple gesture is a clear example of podding in action (see below).
To the haters of Israel, it is a wink to continue the hatred, the violence and the extremism, vindicating the action that Israel has taken in defending itself against an existential threat.
To those genuinely seeking a peaceful resolution and an end to the horror of war, Mashni offers soothing words that now sound hollow in the light of his wink of hypocrisy and his nod to the politics of division.
The end of the suffering of the Palestinians can begin with ditching the slogan 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,' which was once inspirational and unifying but has now become a focal point for haters, trolls, extremists and the hypocrites? (Agree/Disagree)
Origin of the slogan
“From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” is an antisemitic slogan commonly featured in anti-Israel campaigns and chanted at demonstrations.
This rallying cry has long been used by anti-Israel voices, including supporters of terrorist organizations such as Hamas and the PFLP, which seek Israel’s destruction through violent means. It is fundamentally a call for a Palestinian state extending from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, territory that includes the State of Israel, which would mean the dismantling of the Jewish state. It is an antisemitic charge denying the Jewish right to self-determination, including through the removal of Jews from their ancestral homeland.
Usage of this phrase has the effect of making members of the Jewish and pro-Israel community feel unsafe and ostracized. It is important to note that demanding justice for Palestinians, or calling for a Palestinian state, should not mean, as this hateful phrase posits, denying the right of the State of Israel to exist. ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
What is the Politics of Division (POD)?
The "politics of division," or POD for short, is a tactic used to gain personal, commercial, or political advantage by playing on people's biases, prejudices, or fears. Rather than appealing to unity or common ground, POD focuses on amplifying divisions within society.
Podding is the act of intentionally creating divides between groups. Unlike "dog whistling," where messages are subtly designed to seem reasonable to the general public while secretly signaling to a specific group, podding openly pits one segment of society against another. The goal is to drive a wedge between groups, turning differences into open conflicts or rivalries.
Those who practice podding are known as podsters. Podsters are practitioners of pod who actively work to divide society, often using messaging that stirs up feelings of "us vs. them" or amplifies existing divisions. This divide-and-conquer strategy aims to keep groups in opposition, which can make it easier to sway public opinion or maintain control over a fractured society.
Where the POD Game has led ...
***
About PByT Surveys & Open Democracy
The PByT surveys represent a rolling snapshot of global sentiment from real people whose identity has been verified. The results can be analyzed in a variety of ways to get a better understanding of key issues utilizing Bayesian statistics - a mathematical concept that updates beliefs in light of new data or evidence.
As a result, these surveys have the potential to be the most definitive resources on some of the most critically important issues of modern times and serve as the basis for the idea of "open democracy."
Have your say and help shape the interconnected world of tomorrow based on trust, mutual-aid and cooperation.
Feedback welcome
Please log in to give feedback.
Connect